Mondry v. Mondry
v.
Sharon Jean Mondry, Defendant and Appellee
Judge M. Richard Geiger
| Appellant: | Fleming, DuBois & Fleming, PLLP | |
| Appellee: | Galstad, Jensen & McCann, P.A. |
Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
Issue No. I
The court erred in finding that the Fred Mondry and Sons Norwest operating debt of $55,050 was part of the $229,050 obligation of Tim Mondry, Inc. and therefore was a duplication. (Finding of Fact 23(m)).
Issue No. II
The court erred in placing a marital value of $105,000 on the Minto potato warehouse and then awarding it at that value to Tim rather than Sharon. (Finding of Fact 23(a)).
Issue No. III
The court erred in stating that Tim Mondry had not maximized his borrowing ability with Norwest Bank. (Finding of Fact 26(m)).
Issue No. IV
The court abused its discretion in awarding Sharon $5,000 in attorneys fees in light of the Riverfork federal debt which was for attorneys fees. This amounts to a duplication, (Finding of Fact 23(p)).
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. The court did not abuse its discretion in its finding regarding the amount of debt, as well as the allocation of the debt.
2. The court did not abuse its discretion in its valuation and award of the Minto potato warehouse.
3. The court did not abuse its discretion in its finding that the plaintiff/appellant had not maximized his borrowing ability.
4. The court did not abuse its discretion in its award of attorney's fees.
Add Docket 20000207 RSS