Kraft v. ND State Board of Nursing
v.
North Dakota State
Board of Nursing, Respondent and Appellee
Judge James M. Vukelic
| Appellant: | Carl O. Flagstad Jr. | |
| Appellee: | Calvin N. Rolfson , Spec. Asst. Atty. Gen. | |
| Appellee: | Schulz Geiermann & Bergeson Law Offices, P.C. |
Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.
A. The Board of Nursing failed to adequately discuss its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order
B. The Board of Nursng violated NDCC 28-32-12.1 in making its Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
C. Kraft was not impaired at work on January 22, 1999. If Kraft was impaired, her employer had been forewarned of the impairment and had required Kraft to work despite any impairment.
D. Kraft's conviction for Simple Assault does not constitute a violation of the Standards of Practice of Nursing, nor does it relate adversely to the Practice of Nursing, given the context in which the conviction occurred, and without a showing of how the conviction relates to nursing practices
E. The Board of Nursing's Order was not timely served upon Kraft.
Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
II. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES Appellee Board of Nursing responds to the contentions raised by Appellant Bonnie Kraft in her Statement of the Issues as follows:
A. The Board of Nursing adequately discussed its Findings of Facts, Conclusions of Law, and Order.
B. The Board of Nursing complied with N.D.C.C. 28-32-12.1 when making its Order.
C. A preponderance of the evidence in the record showed that Kraft was impaired on January 22, 1999, and should not have presented herself to work.
D. Kraft's conviction for simple assault is axiomatic to nursing practices, violates standards of the practice of nursing and relates adversely to the practice of nursing.
E. The Board of Nursing's Order was timely served upon Kraft.
F. The District Court erred in finding that Kraft's refusal to submit to chemical testing did not violate nursing standards.
Add Docket 20000320 RSS