Brandt v. Milbrath

20010294 Eldora Hagen Brandt, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Aldon James Milbrath, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, Northeast Judicial District, Bottineau County
Judge Donovan John Foughty
Nature of Action: Personal Injury
Counsel:
Appellant: Maring Williams Law Office
Appellant: Lawyer not licensed in N.D.
Appellee: McGee, Hankla, Backes & Dobrovolny
Term: 05/2002   Argument: 05/23/2002  09:30am
ND cite: 2002 ND 117
NW cite: 647 N.W.2d 674

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
I. Did the trial court err in determining there was sufficient evidence to support the jury's finding of "no negligence?
II. Did the trial court err by excluding the testimony of witness Victoria Boehnke?

Appellee's Statement of the Issues:
1. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in determining that there was sufficient evidence to support the verdict?
2. Did the trial court abuse its discretion by excluding the testimony of Victoria Boehnke?

Add Docket 20010294 RSS Add Docket 20010294 RSS

Docket entries:
111/30/2001 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 11/29/2001
211/30/2001 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 11/29/2001
311/30/2001 ANNOUNCED DISQUALIFICATION: Maring, Mary Muehlen
401/07/2002 Affidavit of Matthew A. Biergert in compliance with Rule 11.1, N.D.R.Ct.
501/07/2002 RECORD ON APPEAL, w/exception of Clerk's Cert. Nos. 47 (shorthand notes), 55 (Pl. Court Ex.#50, 51,
601/07/2002 61, 65, 66); 56 (Pl. Court Ex. #67,67A, 68, 68A); 57 (Pl. Court Ex. #73, 73A, 74, 74A);
701/07/2002 59 (Pl. Exhibits #1-10); 60 (Pl. Exhibits #11-19, 21, 26-31); 61 (Pl. Exhibits #33, 34, 36,
801/07/2002 36A-E, 38A, B, C, 39A, B, C, 40A, B, C, D, E, F, 41A, 41B, 41C, 41D, 41E); 62 (Pl. Ex.
901/07/2002 #43A, 43B, 43C); 63 (Pl. Exhibits #44A, 44B, 44C, 44D); 64 (Pl. Exhibit #54); 65 (Pl. Ex. #55);
1001/07/2002 66 (Pl. Ex. #56); 67 (Pl. Exhibits #62A, 69A-69E, 75A, 75B, 76, 77); 68 (Defendant's Ex. 100);
1101/07/2002 69 (Def. Ex. 101); 70 (Def. Ex. #103); 71 (Def. Ex. #104); 72 (Pl. Ex. #105A, 107, 108;
1201/07/2002 73 (Pl. Ex. #109); 74 (Def. Court Ex. #105), which were retained in the trial court
1301/18/2002 TRANSCRIPT DATED 6-18-01 through 6-21-01 (4 volumes)
1401/24/2002 DISK - TRA (6-18-01, 6-19-01, 6-20-01, & 6-21-01) (e-mailed)
1502/07/2002 Clerk's Supp. Cert. on Appeal dated February 6, 2002 with entry 99 (Order & Amended Judgment)
1602/19/2002 Supplemental Clerk's Certificate dated 2-15-02 (Plaintiff's Exhibits 1, 9, 36, 36A-E, 38A-C;
1702/19/2002 39A-C; 40A-F; 41A-E; 56; & 62A
1802/26/2002 APPELLANT BRIEF
1902/26/2002 APPELLANT APPENDIX
2002/26/2002 DISK - ATB (e-mailed)
2103/13/2002 MOT. EXT/TIME APPELLEE BRIEF; AFF. IN SUPPORT
2203/13/2002 ACTION BY CLERK (MAE, w/understanding OA set for May 22, 23, 28, 29 or 30). Granted: 04/26/2002
2304/22/2002 APPELLEE BRIEF
2404/22/2002 APPELLEE APPENDIX
2504/23/2002 DISK - AEB
2604/25/2002 SITTING WITH THE COURT: Jorgensen, Donald L.
2704/25/2002 Additional copy of Supplemental Appendix
2804/25/2002 DISK - aeb
2905/09/2002 REPLY BRIEF
3005/09/2002 DISK - RYB (e-mailed)
3105/23/2002 APPEARANCES: David S. Maring; Collin P. Dobrovolny
3205/23/2002 ARGUED: Maring; Dobrovolny (Vol. X; Page 225)
3305/23/2002 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
3407/15/2002 DISPOSITION: AFFIRMED
3507/15/2002 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Sandstrom, Dale V.
3607/15/2002 (CONCUR in result): Kapsner, Carol Ronning: CON/RES
3707/15/2002 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellee
3807/15/2002 Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties
3907/29/2002 PETITION FOR REHEARING
4007/29/2002 DISK - PER (E-mailed)
4109/09/2002 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT (Pet/Rehearing). Denied
4209/09/2002 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTE PAGES (sua sponte)
4309/09/2002 ACTION BY SUPREME COURT. granted
4409/09/2002 Corrected/Substitute Opinion Pages 8-12 (new pages 8-12 to replace pages 8-13)
4509/09/2002 Order Substituting pages for Opinion Mailed to Parties & publishers
4609/18/2002 MANDATE
4709/20/2002 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE
4810/09/2007 EXPUNGED - Nonpermanent record items destroyed

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 03/12/2010