Meyer v. Meyer

20030214 Timothy R. Meyer, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Diane L. Meyer, Defendant and Appellant

Appeal from: District Court, East Central Judicial District, Cass County
Judge Georgia Dawson
Nature of Action: Divorce/Property Div./Alimony
Counsel:
Appellant: Johannson, Rust, Stock & Rasmusson, P.A.
Appellee: Johnson Law Office P.C.
Term: 12/2003   Argument: 12/08/2003  10:45am
ND cite: 2004 ND 89
NW cite: 679 N.W.2d 273

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the trial court placed sufficient weight on the fact that the current spousal support amount was stipulated to by the parties when marital fault was at issue, and Tim's decrease in income was contemplated.
2. Whether Ms. Meyer has made sufficient efforts to rehabilitate herself.

Add Docket 20030214 RSS Add Docket 20030214 RSS

Docket entries:
107/17/2003 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 07/16/2003
207/17/2003 ORDER FOR TRANSCRIPT: 07/16/2003
308/19/2003 RECORD ON APPEAL & separates #81,90,&91 (Not rec'd: 28 & 57-tapes and 86-Steno Notes)
408/27/2003 DISK (e-mailed) - TRA dated 3-31-03
508/28/2003 TRANSCRIPT DATED 3-31-03
609/04/2003 Letter from Charles A. Stock dated 9-3-03 re: Amended Judgment will be entered in trial court.
709/04/2003 Supplemental Clerk's Certificate dated 9-2-03 (Entry Nos. 103-105)
809/11/2003 Supplemental Clerk's Certificate dated 9-10-03 (Entry Nos. 106-110)
910/06/2003 APPELLANT BRIEF
1010/06/2003 APPELLANT APPENDIX
1110/07/2003 DISK - ATB
1211/04/2003 APPELLEE BRIEF, w/attached Appendix
1311/05/2003 DISK - AEB
1412/08/2003 APPEARANCES: Charles A. Stock; Leslie Johnson Aldrich
1512/08/2003 ARGUED: Stock; Aldrich (Vol. Y; Page 179)
1612/08/2003 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1704/30/2004 Ltr. fm. Leslie Johnson Aldrich dated April 29, 2004, re opinion
1805/05/2004 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
1905/05/2004 SPLIT OPINION: VandeWalle, Gerald W.
2005/05/2004 (CONCUR & DISSENT): Maring, Mary Muehlen: CON/DIS
2105/05/2004 (DISSENT): Sandstrom, Dale V.: DISSENT
2205/05/2004 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of appellant
2305/06/2004 Judgment Mailed to Parties
2405/27/2004 MANDATE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 12/01/2008