Home of Economy v. Burlington Northern

20040267 Home of Economy, a North
Dakota Corporation, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Railroad, a National Railroad
Corporation, Defendant and Appellee

Appeal from: District Court, Northeast Central Judicial District, Grand Forks County
Judge Joel D. Medd
Nature of Action: Contracts
Counsel:
Appellee: Nilles, Ilvedson, Plambeck & Selbo, Ltd.
Appellant: Pearson Christensen & Clapp, PLLP
Term: 01/2005   Argument: 01/11/2005  09:30am
ND cite: 2005 ND 74
NW cite: 694 N.W.2d 840

Listen to recording of oral argument
using RealPlayer Basic,© a free download.

Issues: Appellant's Statement of the Issues:
1. Whether the courts of this State are powerless to prevent the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad from closing a rail crossing which has been open and continuously used by the public for at least 78 years. More specifically, does the Interstate Commerce Termination Act of 1995 (ICCTA) preclude the state from enforcing the public's right of passage across the railroad tracks in question?

Add Docket 20040267 RSS Add Docket 20040267 RSS

Docket entries:
109/20/2004 NOTICE OF APPEAL: 09/17/2004
210/14/2004 RECORD ON APPEAL (not rec'd - 10 & 25(steno notes))
310/27/2004 APPELLANT BRIEF
410/27/2004 E-FILED BRIEF (ATB)
510/27/2004 APPELLANT APPENDIX
610/28/2004 Payment of $25 surcharge for filing electronic ATB (Receipt #15832)
710/29/2004 Received 7 copies of ATB from Central Duplicating
811/02/2004 New table of contents and Judgment of Dimissal (page 70) for ATA & aff. of service by mail
911/24/2004 APPELLEE BRIEF
1011/24/2004 E-FILED BRIEF (AEB)
1111/26/2004 Payment of $25 sucharge for filing electronic AEB - (Reciept #15869)
1212/07/2004 REPLY BRIEF
1312/07/2004 E-FILED BRIEF (RYB)
1412/07/2004 Copies of electronic RYB
1512/21/2004 Request for Radio/TV Coverage (AP) e-email dated 12-21-04 from Dale Wetzel (AUTHORIZED)
1601/11/2005 APPEARANCES: Garry A. Pearson; Daniel J. Crothers
1701/11/2005 ARGUED: Pearson; Crothers (Vol. Z; Page 73)
1801/11/2005 ORAL ARGUMENT WEBCAST
1904/06/2005 DISPOSITION: REVERSED AND REMANDED
2004/06/2005 UNANIMOUS OPINION: Maring, Mary Muehlen
2104/06/2005 Costs on appeal taxed in favor of Appellant
2204/07/2005 Order/Judgment Mailed to Parties
2304/26/2005 Corrected Opinion Pages 4, 5 & 9
2405/03/2005 MANDATE
2505/09/2005 RECEIPT SIGNED BY DISTRICT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE

Generated from Supreme Court Docket on 11/06/2009