[Go to Documents] | Filed Dec. 12, 1988 |
Toby C. McAdam, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
George T. Dynes, Defendant and Appellee
Civil No. 880127CA
Appeal from the County Court of Stark County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable F. Gene Gruber, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Saefke Law Office, P.O. Box 1874, Bismarck, ND 58502-1874, for plaintiff and appellant; argued by Frederick E. Saefke, Jr.
Freed, Dynes, Reichert & Buresh, P.C., P.O. Drawer K, Dickinson, ND 58602-8305, for defendant and appellee; argued by Ronald A. Reichert.
McAdam v. Dynes
Per Curiam.
The summary judgment entered in this action concerning the allocation of the proceeds of a settlement agreement reached in an action filed in federal court is affirmed under NDRAppP 35.1(a)(6).
We do not intend to preclude the pursuit of relief in court. See, e.g., Tyler v. Meola, 113 F.R.D. 184 (N.D. Ohio 1986).
Affirmed.
Douglas B. Heen, S.J., C.J.
Kirk Smith, D.J.
Benny A. Graff, D.J.